Modern science disclaims any intention of understanding the hidden nature of things; its philosophy condemns any such endeavour as vague, misleading and altogether unscientific.…But I refuse to heed this warning. I agree that the process of understanding leads beyond - indeed far beyond - what a strict empiricism regards as the domain of legitimate knowledge; but I reject such an empiricism. If consistently applied, it would discredit any knowledge whatever and it can be upheld only by allowing it to remain inconsistent. It is permitted this inconsistency because its ruthless mutilation of human experience lends it such a high reputation for scientific severity, that its prestige overrides the defensiveness of its own foundations. Our acknowledgement of understanding as a valid form of knowing will go a long way towards liberating our minds from this violent and inefficient despotism. by casino games
online casino games | December 8, 2004 11:45 AM
Entities should not be multiplied unnecessarily. by free online casino
online casino | December 8, 2004 12:10 PM
He who is unable to live in society, or who has no need because he is sufficient for himself, must be either a beast or a god. by poker tables
party poker | December 8, 2004 01:58 PM