The W3C has Mark Pilgrim all riled up with then new XHTML 2.0 working draft. So much so that he’s gone back to HTML 4.0!
“XHTML 2.0 isn’t meant to be backwardly compatible. But damn it, I’ve done everything the W3C has ever recommended… Which means that, after keeping up with all the latest standards, painstakingly marking up all my content, and validating every last page on my site, I’m still stuck in a dead end… Standards are bullshit. XHTML is a crock. The W3C is irrelevant.”
Well hopefully when XML becomes widely accepted we will never have to worry about XHTML again.
I doubt it… I mean we still have regular old HTML, we still have people that code for Netscape 4.0! The W3C is a bit like the internet’s UN some days: lots of play nice talk, very few tangible results.
I don’t see how XML could ever substitute HTML. Because there is no tags in XML with inherent meaning, how could it ever replace HTML? XML implementations; yes, XHTML is one.
As much as I understand the situation, XML provides the semantics, and XSLT renders the data it is fed, making it appear nice and pretty.
But yes, XHTML2.0 sounds like they had the F1 chiefs working on it.
incest girl http://free-adult-insest-stories.stories-pics.com/
how to play blackjack http://jack-black.greatgamblingcasino.info/
Mathematics may be defined as the subject in which we never know what we are talking about, nor whether what we are saying is true. by online casino
All content copyright © 2002 of Ryan Carter
